Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: Ah Hell... I'm a fan of all seven. But right now... I'm gonna have to go with wrath.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1431/f1431f1f6e2dbd1b769f2aa5f7ae990b6f8868e6" alt=""
Wrath is one of the seven deadly sins. And yet anger is so often spoken of as, if not something good, at least something that can be channelled and used for good. When driven by anger a person is harder to corrupt, more difficult to bribe and almost impossible to dissuade. The Gospels tell us that even Jesus was prone to righteous anger, as the money changers in the temple could attest to.
So what is the distinction? Is it the source of the anger or wrath? Is it what you do with it? Can can two things seemingly so similar be so different, one a force for good and one completely destructive?
No comments:
Post a Comment